• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

临床显示肝内胆管癌介入治疗有效率低

  [复制链接]
7722 3 bluest 发表于 2012-5-13 14:56:16 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
本帖最后由 bluest 于 2012-8-17 21:40 编辑

Introduction: No established therapy exists for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We conducted a phase I/II study to ascertain the recommended dose (RD) of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using gemcitabine (GEM) for ICC and to assess the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Methods: Eligibility criteria included unresectable ICC, no priory therapy with GEM, acceptable arterial perfusion to the entire liver through an implantable port system, ECOG PS<2 and normal organ and bone marrow function. GEM was administered through the hepatic artery via the port system as a 30-minute infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for 5 cycles. In the phase I portion, dosage for levels 1, 2 and 3 was set at 600, 800, and 1,000 mg/m2, respectively, and was increased in 3-6 patients at a time. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as a dosage resulting in dose-limiting toxicity in 2 of 3 patients or 3 of 6 patients, and RD was estimated during the first cycle. In the phase II portion, more RD patients were added to assess tumor response and toxicity using RECIST and NCI-CTC (ver. 2.0), respectively.

Results: During the phase I portion, 16 patients were registered. MTD was not reached. Assuming RD at 1,000 mg/m2, the phase II portion enrolled a total of 13 patients. In all cycles, the following Grade 3 or more toxicities were observed: neutropenia 20%, increased GGT 8%, increased AST 4%, increased ALT 4%, increased bilirubin 4%, nausea 4% and fatigue 4%. One patient showed Grade 4 increased bilirubin in 2 cycles, and this patient revealed complication of portal tumor thrombus. The tumor response rate was 7.7% (CR 0, PR 1, SD 8, PD 4).

Conclusion: While the toxicity of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 1,000 mg/m2 GEM for ICC was tolerable, expected efficacy could not be obtained, thus suggesting only minimal activity.

http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meeti ... mp;abstractID=10298

临床采用肝动脉灌注化疗治疗肝内胆管癌,药物吉西他滨,有效率只有7.7%。
深度读帖后再提问,在线时间过短不予回复。
所有信息仅供参考!

3条精彩回复,最后回复于 2019-10-14 19:00

welkin219  小学五年级 发表于 2014-9-19 21:36:02 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 上海
好低啊!

举报 使用道具

回复
徐亮  小学六年级 发表于 2019-6-1 17:42:17 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 北京丰台
幸运随行小天使  初中二年级 发表于 2019-9-9 21:15:35 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 来自: 天津
是因为乏血供吗?还是血管拴不住?

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表